By: John Rusk

John Rusk — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:14:09 +0000

Guess it would run slower though, since would have to compile the expression….

John Rusk — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:53:00 +0000

Thanks. Just what I needed!

By the way, your Invariant class looks interesting. Have you tried doing an expression-based version, like this:

Invariant.ArgumentNotEmpty( () => collection);

I would imagine that you could get the name from the expression. It’s just a shame it can’t be written like this:

Invariant.ArgumentNotEmpty( => collection);

but MS insist on having the empty parentheses.

Comments on: Dynamic Linq Queries - Contains Operator